![]() ![]() At present, I'm not likely to accept a PR as a result. PRs, although welcome and invited, might be based on the repo as it existed some time before, and I will have taken the code in a new direction as I figure out things. Time is on our side, 1.13 is the earliest this will land, and that is some time away yet. This code is often sitting on my desktop in a half working state as I take time to work on it. With Java9 ripping the rug out of how everything is supposed to work, having a broad test suite that represents "yup, it works" will be invaluable. ![]() I hate how unreproducible legacylauncher is. I want everything to have a test, if possible. we probably still need to do the signed but not signed jar hacks from legacylauncher.there is probably a third "initialization cycle" in the launcherservice that isn't represented yet - for once the classloader has stood up.If we die, I want a log file to tell us why immediately, no speculations. Having it baked right into the basic framework removes a huge burden from a lot of places. a universal access transformer - access transformers are a bit of a special bunny, and everyone needs them all the time.The documentation on Voting should be OK, I think it reflects how I believe it should work. In seriousness, areas that need to be reviewed: the details of voting contexts, environment contexts. ![]() Please note this well - this is a holding area as I develop out the initial plans, a more permanent home has yet to be identified TODO It will not be this github repo once complete, it will not be these packages once complete. This is strictly for initial development and review of ideas. ![]() Intended as a replacement for LegacyLauncher, using Java 8 and 9 compatible constructs, in theory. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |